Which counseling approach combines elements of both directive and non-directive styles?

The combined approach in counseling is effective because it integrates both directive and non-directive styles, allowing for a more versatile therapeutic process. In a combined approach, the counselor can provide guidance and structure when necessary, ensuring that clients have a clear framework within which to explore their thoughts and feelings. At the same time, this method encourages clients to take an active role in their therapy, promoting self-discovery and personal growth, which is characteristic of non-directive counseling.

By balancing these two styles, counselors can tailor their approach to the unique needs of each individual, making sessions more relevant and productive. This flexibility can lead to increased engagement from clients, as they may feel empowered by the non-directive elements while also benefiting from the structure provided by directive strategies.

In contrast, the other approaches mentioned do not effectively blend these two styles: collaborative tends to focus more on mutual participation without strong direction from the counselor, selective may imply a choosing of certain aspects from different methods without an effective integration, and recursive doesn’t capture the essence of merging directives with client empowerment. Thus, the combined approach is particularly adept at catering to diverse client needs in therapy.